Showing posts with label Criticism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Criticism. Show all posts

Saturday, July 07, 2007

Quitting Infosys - Jayson

After a stint of over 2 and half years, I have decided to quit from Infosys. Today is my last day in office. Unlike the day I left TCS, I feel quite happy today!

There isn’t much to write about Infy experience. I did meet a couple of good guys, but the overall experience can be hardly called “intellectually challenging”.

No, I am still in the rat race. You see, I have a family to feed So I am onto a smaller company, with the hope that I will find some really challenging technical stuff and would be able to make “some difference”.

From Tech, Life and Jayson!

Wednesday, October 18, 2006

Is Infosys on the right track?

by Prashant Salwan. The author is a professor at IIM, Indore

When Infosys completed its 25th year, one of the major announcements it made was to invest $125 million in training facilities for 2006-07. Investment in employee development is not new, but it is vital when we talk of industry profitability and competitive strategy.

Infosys has shown good growth in turnover, and its revenue per customer is higher than that of Tata Consultancy Services, but in terms of revenue per employee, it is still below TCS and Wipro, and far behind international giants like IBM and Accenture.

In overall terms, TCS has the lowest ticket rates and is best at getting big accounts, Infosys has the high net margin and Wipro is strong in aggressive inorganic growth. The market regards Infosys as the best, as can be seen from its market capitalisation-to-revenue ratio in 2005-06 - this is 10.21 for Infosys, 8.49 for Wipro, 7.22 for TCS, 1.42 for IBM, 1.47 for Accenture and 0.7 for EDS.

If Infosys is to continue doing well as India expands its presence in the global offshoring market (it is around 53 per cent today) and achieves the McKinsey target of $75 billion by 2010, it will have to make some changes in its strategy.

Infosys' maximum growth in 2005-06 is in north America (64.8 per cent), but consolidated global figures show this region accounts for a lower 51 per cent of world growth in IT.

In terms of service lines, "development and maintenance" accounts for 54 per cent of Infosys' growth in 2005-06 whereas "business process management", for instance, grew by just 4 per cent and "engineering services" by just 1.8 per cent.

Apart from the threat low-cost destinations like China and Vietnam pose, multinationals like IBM and Accenture are also ramping up their Indian operations and pose a stiff challenge.

Emerging automation trends like intelligent technology infrastructure that manages itself, and other such trends can render the people-heavy model of Indian companies irrelevant and obsolete.

Also, the Indian education system churns out armies of doers and order-takers and not thinkers. Hence, there is a need to upgrade the skills of employees while moving up the value chain.

Infosys needs to train its employees so that it can move up the value chain and become a business transformation specialist like Accenture. One option is to go in for M&As in domain-specific consulting.

Though banking, financial services and insurance accounts for 36 per cent of Infosys' growth in 2005-06, the potential is a lot more since this accounts for almost 60 per cent of technology spending.

Original story

Thursday, October 12, 2006

Infosys subsidiaries still not standing on their feet

The subsidiaries of Infosys Technologies are still in the investment stage, with two of the four units posting losses, though the company is hopeful of a turn around in a couple of quarters.

Of the four subsidiaries, the Australian operations reported revenues of $27.9 million (Rs 126 crore) with a net profit of $5.8 million (Rs 26 crore) for Q2. The consulting business reported revenues of $11.64 million (Rs 52 crore) with a loss of $3.27 million (Rs 14.7 crore), while the China operations reported revenues of $3.7 million (Rs 16.65 crore) with a loss of $1.3 million (Rs 5.85 crore). The BPO business posted revenues of Rs 157 crore with a net profit of Rs 22.6 crore.

At the Q2 results announcement here on Wednesday, group head (worldwide sales and customer delivery) SD Shibulal said the China operations have been bogged down by its global customers expressing serious concern over protection of intellectual patent in that country resulting in lower business. However, he said, the company has bagged a million-dollar deal in China and expects to see a turnaround in the next fiscal.

On consulting operations, Shibulal said it is in the investment mode and is expected to become profitable in the next two-three quarters and added 19 new clients in Q2.

On the impact of US slowdown, CEO Nandan Nilekani said it had done a dipstick survey of its customers and there was no evidence of any slowdown.

He said IT spend by companies is expected to remain flat, but the growing trend of globalisation of IT services will put it in an advantageous position. Infosys has got repeat business of 95% in Q2.

The Infosys CEO said the legacy giants (read IBM, Accenture) do not posing a threat to its business despite expanding their presence in India.

Infosys has also come out with a deferred bonus scheme for its senior management at the level of vice presidents. These bonuses will range from $20,000 (Rs 9 lakh) to $1.25 lakh (Rs 56 lakh) depending on the seniority. This bonus scheme is expected to benefit about 170 employees.

Original story

Friday, October 06, 2006

Innovation: Outsourcing's Second Wave

Companies want an edge through new business models, but in innovative strategic thinking for clients, Indian IT firms lag the global giants, says Forrester's Navi Radjou

Back in June, IBM's (IBM) Chief Executive Sam Palmisano lit a traditional Indian lamp to kick off the company's largest-ever town hall meeting in Bangalore. Then he announced to his 43,000 Indian employees—an eighth of his global workforce—that IBM would invest $6 billion in India over the next three years.

It was a significant event for IBM—but it was an even more significant moment in the history of the global IT service industry. Palmisano heralded a new chapter in outsourcing, one where the big global players like IBM and Accenture (ACN) will lord it over the upstart Indian offshore IT services companies.

For the last two decades, the Indians pioneered and dominated the outsourcing game. Companies like Infosys (INFY), Wipro (WIT), and Tata Consultancy Services (TACSF), with their low-cost global delivery of services model, were able to leverage their talent at a low cost and deliver competitively priced IT services.

They specialized in providing such things as application development, infrastructure support, and business process outsourcing (BPO) to cost-conscious, top-tier multinational clients. The Indians disrupted the existing business models of high-priced consultants like IBM and Accenture, which saw their IT service revenues dwindle in recent years.

But now these Western players are turning the tables on their Eastern rivals. Corporate leaders are seeking more than cost efficiency to help boost profits. They are looking for innovation from their IT consultants that will help them increase their revenues. Here, global players like IBM and Accenture are coming out tops.

COMPETING THROUGH OPERATIONS. First, they are starting to beat the Indians at their own game by expanding the size of their offshore workforce to keep up with the competition for talent. IBM has more than quadrupled its Indian technical staff in recent years and is catching up with Accenture, which has already drastically expanded its offshore services capabilities.

Secondly, while using their offshore locations like India to help customers save costs, these Western consulting firms are now using their industrywide expertise to create global innovation networks (GIN), which they can tap into to create competitive new products and business models for their customers.

According to a recent survey of top-level executives sponsored by SAP (SAP), 55% of corporate leaders worldwide report that new business models—organizational structures, competencies, processes, and partnerships that define how a company operates—will confer a greater strategic advantage than new products and services by 2010. And both IT and business execs tell us that consultants remain one of their top sources for such business innovations.

This is where the Indian and other offshore providers lag. Offshore vendors are currently telling clients: "We will free resources for you to innovate." To which chief executives at client firms are now responding: "No, we want you to help us innovate." When Satyam (SAY) and Infosys talk about "process innovation" or "service innovation," they mean applying Six-Sigma or agile development techniques to optimize their own internal IT service delivery processes, not to innovate their clients' industry-specific processes and services.

And while Wipro and Tata Consulting employ research and development teams that can help firms innovate their products, they are not trained to deliver what chief executives care about most: new business models. So, offshore outsourcers need to align their interpretation of innovation with their clients'.

TEAMS OF INNOVATORS. Here, smart Western consultants have sensed and seized the opportunity. Here's how they work. These players are upgrading their own global delivery infrastructure to deliver not just technical services like applications development, but also business innovation services. That's where the global innovation networks come in. These are global ecosystems of internal and external partners that collaboratively design and deliver business innovations that clients want.

For instance, the software activities of IBM's Center for Business Optimization, whose consultants help reengineer and optimize clients' business models, are done in Bangalore by PhDs trained in operations research. In one current project, these Bangalore-based PhDs are working with IBM's logistics experts in Zurich and Japanese software engineers in IBM's Yamato Software Lab to jointly develop and deliver a scalable supply-chain optimization model to European and Asian clients.

Ditto for Accenture, whose Institute for High Performance relies on India-based MBAs to devise industry-transforming business models. And Deloitte's Intellectual Asset Management practice relies on a 100%-virtual innovation network, tapping a global expert network of 300-plus respected scientists, engineers, and physicians to help clients worldwide maximize their intellectual property (IP) portfolio value.

MORE THAN ENGINEERS. For now, the Western players are galloping away with the prizes. Offshore players in India and elsewhere can catch up—but only if they change their mindset and move fast. They need to acquire a new client-focused innovation mindset by recasting their operationally focused mission statement to help clients innovate by transforming their business processes, market offerings, or business models to boost value for their enterprise.

To effectively carry out this client-focused business innovator mission, offshore providers need a fresh, new talent pool and expertise. They need business designers who can invent new business models, industry specialists who can tailor business innovations to suit the client's context, and they need to extend their reach to global players who can broker and orchestrate the GINs for them.

So, in addition to the famous IIT-minted software engineers and mechanical engineering PhDs who can create massive programs and design jumbo jets, offshore providers also need MBAs and PhDs in economics who can design clients' new business models. These business designers must operate not out of India, but on European and U.S. soil where their clients are based. That way, while its software programmers in Bangalore are coding customer Food Lion's multichannel commerce platform, for instance, Infosys' U.S.-based microeconomists can invent the cross-channel pricing models.

STRATEGIC ADVISERS. Business execs in multinationals tell us that they are impressed by offshore providers' technical talent and project management skills, but underwhelmed by their vertical-specific process knowledge and domain expertise. To deliver business innovation to non-IT execs, offshore providers must retrain their consultants to act less as client order-takers or peddlers of cookie-cutter tech frameworks, and more as strategic advisers who can anticipate clients' business needs and engage them in collaborative innovation scenarios.

For example, before responding to a proposal from General Motors' (GM) IT department to upgrade its OnStar telematics software, Wipro's management consultants should proactively propose to the carmaker's chief financial officer a value-based pricing scheme, with risk-reward sharing, to co-develop and co-market an energy-efficient new car in emerging markets.

Finally, what is needed are some savvy global brokers. Offshore providers today promote their human assets, i.e., "we can rapidly assemble a team of our 5,000 engineers just for you." But users don't want to rely on a single provider's expertise alone to address their multifaceted innovation needs: Most users tell Forrester they prefer best-of-breed IT services from all over instead.

EMPHASIS ON ACUMEN. Offshore providers must form business development teams capable of seeding and orchestrating the external ecosystems of innovation specialists. With such Innovation Networks in place, Tata Consulting can quickly tap a Shanghai-based logistics expert to co-develop an innovative global transportation solution for GE's (GE) manufacturing unit in China.

Offshore players are behind in this second wave of outsourcing, but they needn't be if they can quickly build upon their existing strengths—trust-based, transparent client relationships and mature, automated global delivery processes—to shape these global innovation networks. Some already have pockets of expertise to drive industry-specific business innovation—Infosys has an expertise in financial services and Wipro in IP portfolio management, for instance. But their technical skills typically overshadow their business acumen.

Now is the time for Indian and other offshore players to emphasize the latter and transform themselves from low-margin IT vendors into strategic GIN services providers. As these global networks take off, companies will be able to access innovation twice over: from within their organizations and from outside, through their vendors or partners. That's when the true benefits of globalization will start to accrue, and make customers the real winners.

Navi Radjou is a vice-president with Forrester Research. He advises senior executives including chief information officers worldwide, on new organizational designs and business processes their firms must adopt to sustain global competitiveness through technology-enabled innovation
Original story

Thursday, September 28, 2006

Infosys Blogs and Criticisms

Infosys Technologies has 4 5 blogs now.

Think Flat - http://www.infosysblogs.com/thinkflat/

Managing OffshoreIT - http://www.infosysblogs.com/managing-offshore-it/

Microsoft - http://www.infosysblogs.com/microsoft/

SOA - http://www.infosysblogs.com/soa/

Web 2.0 - http://www.infosysblogs.com/web2/ (Updated: 12-Nov-06)

Webyantra , a tech blog that profiles Indian web products & services, has attacked Infosys' Think Flat blogs by calling this an shameless opportunism! The blog looks like an advertisement effort rather than an innovative medium to communicate. The criticism questions the word 'think flat' and proves that the tone of 'think flat' is quite negative.
Quoting Webyantra:


I read through the blog’s content ; it seems less like a regular blog and more like a compulsive eulogy of Friedman’s theory (Thomas Friedman incidentally, has quoted extensively about Infosys in his book). Sree (who apparently works for Infosys) suggests in this incisive blog post that the general tone of ThinkFlat seems quite negative with its over-emphasis on the word ‘flat’ which is usually used in a negative sense. I would tend to agree with him. In fact, I find the entire communication in the campaign quite unimaginative and ill-conceived. For the (ad+blog) seem to celebrate Friedman’s Theory of the Flat World, with the tacit message that if that theory is true, then Infosys is a default choice. This argument adds credence to the stereotype of Indian software services companies as being nothing more than smart (or shameless?) opportunists. I would have liked to see the (ad+blog) give me solid reasons as to why should the world go to Infosys, instead of taking refuge under Friedman’s theory.


It is not clear what is the purpose of these blogs. Is Infosys giving public blogs for employees, for improving their written communication skills? ;-) That sounds like a better option for me! Otherwise Infosys could take this opportunity for testing its brand name and see how people react even if do blunders, and measure the tolerance quotient in the blogosphere!

Gautam Ghosh also questioned why has Infosys started these 'think flat'and 'managing offshore it' blogs. Quoting Gautam:

The question I am left with is, why has Infosys started these blogs? They don't seem to be adding any conversation so far. Mohan's blog hasn't got a single comment so far. The content seems to be focussed at Infosys' clients and their language. Do they think this blog will show their thought leadership in this area and sway their clients from going back to Accenture and IBM now that theyhave Indian delivery centres too?

There are some conversations for which blogs are suited and some for which they are not. Infy needs to get that right, in my opinion.


Sree's Tech Notes, the blog of the Infosys employee (we are not sure though) mentioned in webyantra, proves with examples that the word 'think flat' sounds very negative. He also published review of Infosys' think flat blog, which again attacks the purpose of the blog and giving suggestions for improving the blog website.

It seems Infosys want to capitalise on Tom Friedman's book and also utilise the new web 2.0 technologies and showcase as a leader. But they have not done the homework before jumping in. Quick decisions and not always the good decisions!

Monday, September 18, 2006

Infosys Core Banking Solutions does not Stand a Chance in World Competition

Infosys is in for a great lesson as it tries to dump in core banking solutions custom built for India on international banking sectors. Infosys, which is dominating the banking software space in India, is bullish on growth in the domestic and global markets in its bid to emerge as a top provider of core banking solutions to banks worldwide.

According to experts, the company filled with inexperience top management are doomed for failure as it tries to sell pre-built software. It is easy to sell "bodies" but it is something else to try and sell pre-built real software.

What the Indian companies have done till this date is to provide cheap India programmers who can sit and code based on specifications from software engineers in America and Europe.

Most of these so called Indian Engineers have degree in Engineering fields other than Computer Science and is driven into software code writing with money and glamour. Mostly they are world's worst software developer. Little they care about documentation and software life cycle.

American companies see excellent software engineers in US educated in America with Masters degrees in Computer Science. Their naïve thinking makes them feel they can get the same in India for pennies on the dollar. They go to India and subcontract code development to reduce cost and increase productivity at the cost of quality.

Infosys's growth came from that. Now that it ventures into real software area instead of supplying so called unqualified cheap 'cyber-coolies', its real capabilities will come out. Now it will face world class software talents. According to international think tanks, Infosys stands no chance.

Full story